• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Oedipus Vs Hamlet A Character Comparison Essay

Comparison Of Oedipus The King vs. Hamlet vs. Waiting For Godot

  • Length: 1020 words (2.9 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
Some of the first forms of drama come from ancient Greece. Oedipus the King by Sophocles is a great example of ancient Greek tragedy, Hamlet by Shakespeare is the example of drama of Elizabethan period and Samuel Becketts Waiting for Godot represents the drama of the 20th century and belongs to so called. Theatre of the Absurd. Because all these dramas come from different period of time, it's natural that they differ from each other in many aspects.

The Greek tragedy has unity of time, place and action, since it takes place all in one day, happens in a single scene, and develops only one plot. In Hamlet that rule is broken. Action takes place in the garden, in the castle, in the cemetery. The play doesn't have the unity of time and has many plots. In Waiting for Godot, however, we see close adherence to the three unities. The unity of time is two days and action is set in one place, where Vladimir and Estragon are waiting for Godot.
In ancient drama, the character is often of noble birth and hold an important social position. At the same time, he is the tragic hero and any decision he makes lead him to personal catastrophe. An ancient main character is a victim of tragic irony. A hero commits a crime not being aware of that. He suffers some serious misfortune which is not accidental and meaningless, but is significant and logically connected with the his actions. A character in ancient drama is not largely developed psychologically. We do not get a full picture of king Oedipus personality. We've got very little information about his appearance; his action and speech don't tell us anything about his emotions. In contrast, we know a lot about Hamlet's emotions and feelings. Unlike Greek tragedy, a hero in modern drama, is often an ordinary person, not high born. Modern drama such as “Waiting for Godot” shows the tragedy not of the strong and noble, but weak and mean character.
The basic structure of the ancient drama has to do with the concept of myth. Stories were based on myth or history. The moral of these kind of myths was that the beginning and the end of the human life must only be in the God's hands. The ancient Greeks believed that some humans could be forced by fate to act wrongly, even if they didn't want to.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Comparison Of Oedipus The King vs. Hamlet vs. Waiting For Godot." 123HelpMe.com. 14 Mar 2018

LengthColor Rating 
Comparing the Human Condition in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead and Waiting for Godot - Comparing the Human Condition in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead and Waiting for Godot                          Inspired by Beckett’s literary style, particularly in ‘Waiting for Godot’, Stoppard wrote ‘Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead’.  As a result of this, many comparisons can be drawn between these two plays.  Stoppard’s writing was also influenced by Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’.  Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as minor characters exist within Shakespeare’s world providing Stoppard with his protagonists.  However, the play is not an attempt to rewrite ‘Waiting for Godot’ in a framework of Shakespeare’s drama.   In studying these texts, the reader is provoked into analysing, co...   [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]1328 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Comparison of a Play within a Play in Hamlet Essay - Even though they are performing the same scene, the two movies are very different in style. First, the shots and lighting are displayed differently to catch the different moods of the movies. In the first movie, the camera stays close to everybody's face. It seems to zoom in on characters that are speaking and does not try to capture the listeners' reactions to those who are speaking. Also, the lighting is very dark and the scene is closed in. The background scenery of a castle room is very small and closed in....   [tags: World Literature]773 words
(2.2 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Provoking Revenge In Hamlet Essay example - Storming into the palace and throwing accusations at Claudius, Laertes reveals he is impulsive. Laertes anger is due to the dishonor that has been inflicted on his family by Polonius’s murder. Claudius takes advantage of the sudden appearance of Laertes, by provoking Laertes into assisting him in plotting Hamlet’s murder. Shakespeare uses Laertes not only as a catalyst in the story, but as a contrast to the pensive Hamlet. Both men seek the same kind of justice but chose different paths to attain it....   [tags: essays research papers]488 words
(1.4 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Essay about A Comparison of the Revenge of Fortinbras and Hamlet - In Hamlet, Shakespeare introduces us to Fortinbras and Hamlet. Both characters are bent on avenging the death of their fathers who were murdered. In Act I, two different revenge plots by these two men are revealed, and while Fortinbras is very open and bold about killing Claudius, Hamlet is sly and quiet about his plan. Fortinbras is also dead set on attacking Denmark no matter what but Hamlet is indecisive about killing Claudius. Fortinbras plans to lead an army to attack Denmark while Hamlet’s plan of attack is to act crazy....   [tags: Hamlet Essays]
:: 1 Works Cited
908 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
stoppard and beckett comparison Essay - Normally an author wouldn't say whether or not they have been directly influenced by another author or playwright. When you actually read their work however, it becomes clear that some authors share common views on certain subjects or admire another author or playwright so much that their own style begins to directly reflect the work of another. I believe this is the same connection shared by the modern dramatists and absurdist writers Tom Stoppard and Samuel Beckett. The connection between these two authors is clearly shown through the study of Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead....   [tags: Papers]2048 words
(5.9 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
William Shakespeare's Hamlet and Sophocles' Oedipus the King Essay - William Shakespeare's Hamlet and Sophocles' Oedipus the King      Though Shakespeares’ Hamlet and Sophocles’ Oedipus the King were written in two different eras, echoes of the latter can be found in the former. The common theme of Hamlet and Oedipus the King is regicide. Also, like in Oedipus the King, there is a direct relationship between the state of the state and the state of their kings. Furthermore, there is also a relationship between Oedipus’ armed entrance into the bedroom in which Jocasta hanged herself, and Hamlet’s confrontation of Gertrude in her bedroom....   [tags: Hamlet Oedipus King Essays]1377 words
(3.9 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Essay on Waiting on Dr. King's Dream - Waiting on Dr. King's Dream      Martin Luther King, Jr.'s, "I Have a Dream", was delivered on the steps at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. on August 28, 1963. Dr. King starts his speech by recalling the Emancipation Proclamation which gave hope to those who were bound by slavery. Yet this hope has definitely faded. One hundred years later African Americans are still in captivity. Although slavery does not exist, those of color are bound by the color of their skin. While African Americans are a large part of society, they are pushed to the corners and often feel exiled in their own land....   [tags: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Essays]
:: 1 Works Cited
1321 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on Comparison of Oedipus and Hamlet - Comparison of Oedipus and Hamlet Compare and contrast Oedipus and Hamlet. Is Oedipus more a man of action. Or is he more a man driven by whim and sudden, rash decisions. Which character is more selfless. Does Hamlet show any signs of selfish motives in his actions or inactions. Which protagonist seems more learned. wiser. more religious. more loving. more incestuous. Which seems to be a better murder investigator. Does Oedipus have any of Claudius' motives when he kills the king, Laius. Then which murderer is more blameworthy--Oedipus or Claudius....   [tags: Oedipus Rex Hamlet Plays Literature Essays]1320 words
(3.8 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Essay on A Comparison of Death Of A Salesman and Hamlet - A Comparison of Death Of A Salesman and Hamlet Willy Loman and Hamlet, two characters so alike, though different. Both are perfect examples of tragedy in literature, though for separate reasons and by distinct methods. The definition of a tragedy, in a nutshell, states that for a character to be considered tragic, he/she must be of high moral estate, fall to a level of catastrophe, induce sympathy and horror in the audience, and usually die, and in doing so, re-establish order in the society....   [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]616 words
(1.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Comparison of Fall of Man and Hamlet Essay - Comparison of Fall of Man and Hamlet The medieval traditions shown in the "Fall of Man" were very apparent in Shakespeare's play, Hamlet. It is not known whether or not Shakespeare ever read the "Fall of Man", and it does not matter, for the effects and influence of the “Fall of Man” on Shakespeare's writing is very obvious when the plots of both stories are examined. Both are written in archaic form, as well as with a very strict rhyme scheme. “The Fall of Man” is a tragedy, the same as Hamlet....   [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]708 words
(2 pages)
Better Essays[preview]

They believed in Ate – a goddess whose task is to lead people into confusion. She is the error that pushes people to do silly things. She was the one, who pushed Oedipus to escape from his country and kill his father on his way. When Oedipus found out from the Oracle that he would commit two awful crimes, he tried to avoid this by running away from his family, which wasn't his family. He acted as if he was divine; he thought he was stronger than fate. Unfortunately, the stranger he met on his way, was his father. And he killed him. And a women he later got married to, was his mother. In this way, Sophocles asserted that the gods are more powerful than man, that there's a limit to human ability and reason. Oedipus was punished because the moment he was told he was to kill his father and marry his mother, he thought that he could change the fate. He forgot that there's a distinction between Gods and humans – a distinction between immortals and mortals. Greek Gods want people to remember that they aren't divine. If they forget about it, they'll commit a sin and it'll mislead them. In Greek language it's called hubris. When people forget that they are mortal, they become guilty pf hubris and this pushes them into the situation when they can commit error and flaw. This brings about their destruction. In contrast, Hamlet isn't punished by Gods because he forgets that he is mortal. Hamlet fails because he has a tragic flaw in his personality and behavior. In other words, in “Hamlet” the tragic flaw is not connected with a particular situation but with a character. In “Oedipus the King” tragic flaw isn't attached to a character but it is a moment of ironous judgment. It is a moment of “character's blindness”. A person should be aware of killing anyone but because Oedipus is mistaken and he doesn't recognize his father it's a moment of wrong judgment. In “Hamlet” tragic flaw is connected to the orginal sin, to something that constantly pushes us to commit a sin. Hamlet did not always have this flaw in his personality. It was presented to him by a ghost. The ghost of Hamlet's father told Hamlet that he was murdered by Claudius and asked him to take the revenge. This is where the flaw is adopted by Hamlet and begins to effect his life. Hamlet makes his revenge everything in his life and it eventually drives him to madness and murder. We see that Shakespearean drama has elements of a morality play, showing people the consequences of a certain behaviour. Everything that happens in Greek tragedy is predetermined by fate, while in Shakespeare play there's more psychological aspect. Hamlet is not really doomed to choose badly. He can choose what he wishes, but he decides badly. As for “Waiting for Godot” the action is full of absurd, seemingly without sense, has repeated verses and no logical consequence of the events.
In ancient drama recognition plays very important role. It is one of the basic element of the plot. It is the moment when the character finds out the whole truth about his life. Recognition is the most critical moment because the character begins to see what the audience know. It's also the most ironic moment because the moment Oedipus learns the truth and finally sees, he plugs out his eyes. Most ancient heroes suffer and survive because the aim of the plot is not to destroy them but to lead them into the moment of recognition. In Shakespearean plays heroes usually end with committing suicide.

VCCS Litonline Introduction to Literature
English 112 (English Composition II)
Click on the sphinx to read the play.

Oedipus the Wreck

Oedipus vs. Hamlet

Compare and contrast Oedipus and Hamlet. Is Oedipus more a man of action? Or is he more a man driven by whim and sudden, rash decisions? Which character is more selfless? Does Hamlet show any signs of selfish motives in his actions or inactions? Which protagonist seems more learned? wiser? more religious? more loving? more incestuous? Which seems to be a better murder investigator? Does Oedipus have any of Claudius' motives when he kills the king, Laius? Then which murderer is more blameworthy--Oedipus or Claudius?

Different men in different eras: los41183 said in 2000:  "It is hard to compare two men with such obvious religious and moralistic differences. Oedipus grew up in the time of the Greek gods, gods who set their examples through destruction of the titans, incestuous marriages with siblings, and rash actions that changed the way their followers lived. Hamlet, on the other hand, grew up with strict Catholicism shaping his conscience. He followed that conscience to the letter, allowing for the lengthy period in between the revelation of the ghost to the actual bloodbath in the closing scenes.

This lapse is what sets the differences between Oedipus and Hamlet, for as soon as Oedipus had the truth fully revealed to him, he acted, rash as his actions may have been. By far, Oedipus is the more thorough of investigators, but this is due mainly to his hubris that will not allow otherwise.* Hamlet took his time to trap Claudius into admission of guilt, whereas all of Thebes knew that Oedipus was on the lookout for a murderer.

The quiet, pensive nature of Hamlet versus the vainglorious outrage of Oedipus is the key to the debate over whether the actions both men take are selfish or selfless. This is a debate that is not answered easily and fully deserves further thought. When discussing which of the murders was the worst, that of Claudius comes to mind first. After putting thought into the mass murder of Laius' caravan, though, that thought is taken back. Which truly is worse, premeditated regicide or heat-of-the-moment "road rage" (the original road rage at that)? As a usurper of throne and wife, Claudius is the ultimate familiar turncoat, but as a guiltless killer of men who would not let him pass on a road, one must wonder if Oedipus has a conscience at all. One can suppose that this, again, is the result of religious values and differences in the time period."**

* [Editor's Note: Oedipus was also trying to find out his own identity and parentage at the same time, a complication Hamlet did not have to face.]

** [Ed.: It's true that when he tells his story about killing where 3 roads meet, Oedipus expresses no remorse over the slaughter; even one who kills in self-defense should feel a sense of loss and regret the taking of life.]

A list from 2000 (anonymous)

  • Both protagonists were passionately determined to find the truth.
  • Both were impulsive.
  • Both had immense self-pride, but--
  • Ultimately, both were good natured.
  • They seek revenge for their fathers (although this is ironic in Oedipus Rex)
  • Although O's arrogance may have led to his downfall, it is their impulsiveness that does in each man: O's decree of exile parallels the gods' requirements, but Hamlet's stabbing of Ophelia's father right after NOT stabbing Claudius means that, in the grand scheme of things, he will have to die rather than assume the throne.
  • Both plays are tragedies that result from behind-the-scenes machinations--the gods plot against O's family because of Laius, while King Hamlet's brother plots against him.
  • Perhaps the vivid imagery of poison in Hamlet parallels the curse "in the family blood" in Greek tragedies in Oedipus Rex.
  • Both plays are written in highly poetic language.

Passionate Oedipus vs. Pensive Hamlet: Becky Dorsett (Northern Virginia CC, 1998) offers this list of contrasts between the two tragic protagonists:  "In comparing and contrasting Oedipus and Hamlet, I see Oedipus as more of a man given to sudden, rash decisions and quick temper. Oedipus is definitely a man of action, where Hamlet stews over whether he should kill Claudius. Oedipus is a proud and selfless man, but is more concerned about his image than Hamlet. Hamlet is a very sensitive, moody person, very much in awe of his deceased father, who obviously didn't care about his image or he wouldn't have feigned 'madness'. Oedipus was a very passionate man, passionate about his position, his wife/mother, people of Thebes, and passionate about his concern for Polybus and Merope. Hamlet shows no genuine love for anyone except for his father and maybe his mother, but this is questionable because he would've killed his mother had the ghost instructed him to. Even when Hamlet declares his love for Ophelia, he later claims it's not true. He is, however, passionate about killing Claudius. Another contrast is that Hamlet is a thinker and a planner, where Oedipus is more emotional and wasn't patient enough to fully investigate the murder of Laius."

Blame Oedipus for killing but not incest, Hamlet for both: Fargo2 (1998) contributed this set of contrasts: "Hamlet is less a man of action than Oedipus. Oedipus s a man of quick action and hasty conclusions who doesn't even attempt to foresee the consequences of his actions. As for which is the more selfless, I can't see much but self interest in either of them. Hamlet is more of a scholar than Oedipus, he is also the wiser of the two, even at the height of madness. In the matter of religion I believe Oedipus to be the more religious of the two, though that can be attributed to the nature of the Greek gods. It is easy to be religious when you may run into a god at any moment. Which of the two are the most incestuous? Hamlet, Oedipus' incest is unknown to him. Oedipus is the better investigator, finding the killer quickly and easily. Oedipus had no real reason to kill King Laius, making him far more worthy of blame for the killing than Claudius."

Ruler vs. Scholar: Laura Whitehead (1998) saw these contrasts--but holds Claudius the most worthy of blame: "Oedipus is much more decisive than Hamlet. It takes the entire play before Hamlet makes up his mind, and then it is Claudius who brings about the finale, not Hamlet. Oedipus is quick to judge and make decisions before he really thinks about them.

"I believe Hamlet to be the more selfless of the two. He was also selfish, though; he didn’t think how his actions would affect others, such as Ophelia. He realized this in the end, however, and his character grew because of it.

"I think Hamlet was the more learned, but he was still very young. Oedipus, after ruling a kingdom for ten years, was the wiser man. Oedipus was the more religious man, also, a product of the Greek society. Oedipus never really spoke of love, while Hamlet was a very passionate individual. Hamlet was definitely more incestuous; Oedipus was not aware that Jocasta was his mother.

"I think Oedipus was the better investigator, but only because Hamlet didn’t really investigate. The ghost of his father told him what happened; Hamlet just had to prove it. Oedipus did not have any of Claudius’ motives; he did not conspire to commit murder; it was a chance encounter on a road where his anger got the best of him. Claudius is much more blameworthy for conspiring to kill his own brother, just to gain the throne."

Responsibility: jy717 (1999) wondered "1) to what extent is each tragic hero responsible for his own downfall? 2) to what extent does each hero take responsibility for his actions?"

Disgruntled Reader (1999) offered these comparison-contrast questions:

  • How can the ending of the two plays be considered positive ones?
  • To what degrees are Oedipus and Hamlet victims of fate? Of hamarita (fatal character flaw)?


The URL for this page is: http://vccslitonline.cc.va.us/OedipustheWreck/OvHamlet.htm

One thought on “Oedipus Vs Hamlet A Character Comparison Essay

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *